Receiverships
Experienced and Efficient Fiduciaries Serving as the Court’s Agent
Trusted Representation
Efficient Professionals
Experienced Team
Extensive Fiduciary Experience
Since 2004, our lawyers at Damian | Valori | Culmo have been involved in serving as court-appointed receivers or representing receivers appointed by various regulators and enforcement agencies. We represent financial institutions, secured and unsecured individual creditors, and business debtors in financial reorganizations in both state and federal court. We also assist with out-of-court workouts and refinancing and serve as a court-appointed receiver in business restructuring matters. Our firm has successfully marshaled and recovered funds and assets worth millions of dollars and provided substantial returns.
How Our Team Can Serve You
Receiver, Distribution Agent or Custodian
Counsel to Receiver
Class Counsel
See Example Cases
Federal
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Daniel Fingerhut, et al., Case No. 20-CV-21887-DPG, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (multi-million dollar binary options affiliate marketing fraud), Court-Appointed Receiver
Federal Trade Commission v. On Point Global LLC, et al., Case No. 19-CV-25046,U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Today’s Growth Consultant, LLC d/b/a The Income Store, et al., Case No. 19-CV-08454-ARW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (IncomeStoreReceivership.com) ($100+ million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Consumer Collection Advocates Capital LLC, et al., Case No. 16-CV-24678-COOKE/TORRES, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver (www.OnixReceivership.com)
U.S. Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Collection Advocates, et al., Case No. 14-62491-CIV-BLOOM, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, (ccaReceivership.com) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Worth Group, Inc., et al., (Case No. 9:13-cv-80796-KLR), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (WorthMonitor.com) ($30 million commodities fraud investigation) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Special Monitor)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hunter Wise Commodities, LLC, et al. (Case No. 9:12-cv 81311-DMM), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (HunterWiseManager.com) ($150 million commodities fraud investigation) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Special Monitor/Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. We the People Inc., of the United States (Case No. 2:13-cv-14050-JEM), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (WeThePeopleReceivership.com) ($75 million securities fraud investigation) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aubrey Lee Price, et al. (Case No. 1:12-cv-2296-TCB), in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (pfgReceivership.com) ($55 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marc Roup, et al. (Case No. 09-CD-01685), in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ($5 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Sean Nathan Healy, et al. (Case No. 09-CV-1331), in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (HealyReceivership.com) ($18 million commodities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Concorde America, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-80128-CIV-ZLOCH/SNOW, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Miami Division, Court-Appointed Distribution Agent
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bio-Heal Laboratories, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-21116-CIV-SEITZ/O’SULLIVAN, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Miami Division, Court-Appointed Distribution Agent
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles O. Morgan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frederick J. Kunen (Case No. 07-22204-CIV-Gold/Turnoff), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (OptionsTradingFraud.com) ($15 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Timothy Joseph Atkinson, et al., Case No. 18-CV-23992-JEM, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (AllinpublishingReceivership.com) ($30 million binary options affiliate marketing fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jason B. Scharf, et al., Case No. 17-cv-774-J-32MCR, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (BinaryOptionsReceivership.com) ($45 million binary options affiliate marketing fraud) (Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Terry E. Provence and DT Capital, LLC (Case No. 07-23167-Gold/Turnoff), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (OptionsTradingFraud.com) ($15 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Viatical Capital, Inc., et al. (Case No. 03-CV-1895-T-23-TGW), in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (LifeReceivership.com) ($50 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Pension Fund of America, L.C., et al. (Case No. 05-20863-CIV-Moore), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (pfaReceivership.com) ($75 million securities fraud) (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
State
Nick Norwood vs. Eurosport Active World Corp. and Ralph Hofmeier, Case No. 2010-058982-CA-01, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver.
Joel D. Vega, et al. v. Las Estrellas Condominium Association, Inc., Case No. 15-2310-CA-09, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver.
Janett Poll Sarlabous v. Constantino Bagatelas Kouranov, et al., Case No. 18-87-CA-22, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Custodian Pendente Lite.
South Beach 18, LLC, et al. v. Tziyona Cohen, et al., Case No. 18-023532, Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Custodian
Benjany Viera v. Klever Ontaneda, Case No. 12-5693-FC-04, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County Florida, Family Division, Court-Appointed Receiver
Estate of Robert Warren Meddoff, Deceased, Case No. PRC-130005341, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, Probate Division, Court-Appointed Curator
Spenzi v. Green, Case No. 13-0225945 FC 04, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
Fannie Mae v. Residences at 107 Avenue, Inc., Case No. 11-14926 CA32, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
Wauchula State Bank v. Ridobel Gonzalez et al., Case No. 10-37523 CA-13, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
U.S. Mortgage Finance II, LLC v. 3079 Aventura Lakes, LLC, Case No. 09-59337CA13, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
U.S. Mortgage Finance II, LLC v. 1406 Mystic Point, LLC, Case No. 09-59351 CA 13, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
Amanecer Investment Company, LLC v. Amanecer Christian Network, Inc., et al., Case No. 06-7931-CA-31, Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Counsel for Receiver
BAC Florida Bank, a Florida Chapter Bank v. 1910 Island, LLC, et al., Case No. 09-59348CA13, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
State of Florida Office of Financial Regulations v. Robert Kurland Mortgage Co., Inc., Case No. 05-11974 CA 30, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Receiver
Floriano de Alencar Filho v. Mony Life Ins. Co. of the Americas, Ltd, Case No. 06-23093-CA-21, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Court-Appointed Class Counsel
Nancy Butler-Jones, and Hywel Jones, Nelson I. Del Toro, Mehmet Sahin, Linda Meyers, and William Davis v. Sterling Casino Lines, L.P., Sextant Sterling I, Inc., and John Brevick, Case No. 6:08-cv-01186-ACC-DAB, U.S. District Court, Middle District, Orlando Division, Court-Appointed Class Counsel
Guillermo Santacruz, et al. v. Velocity Express Corporation, Velocity Express Leasing, Inc., Velocity Express, Inc., Case No. 1:08-cv-21591-WMH, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Miami Division, Counsel for Plaintiffs, Served on Court Appointed Executive Committee for Class Plaintiffs in Multi-District Suit
Jerry Gustin, et al. v. Paul A. Hoffman, et al., Case No. 6:08-cv-00057-Orl-31-DAB, U.S. District Court, Middle District, Orlando Division, Court Appointed Class Counsel
Armando Sicard, Karen Cirillo, and Alexis Jose Nevares v. Aquasino, LLC, Case No. 08-20976-CIV-LENARD/GARBER, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Miami Division, Counsel for Collective Class Action Plaintiffs
Towerhouse Condominium, Inc. v. Taicher, et al.; Taicher v. Taicher, et al., Case No. 2018-018522-CA-01, in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Court-Appointed Special Magistrate)
Julieta Spenzi v. Joseph Green, Case No. 13-025945-FC-04, Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Counsel for Court-Appointed Receiver)
When you choose us, you are choosing a trusted law firm with years of experience and a proven track record. At Damian | Valori | Culmo we are dedicated to integrity, efficiency, and achieving the best possible results.
How It Works
You will be contacted by one of our lawyers who will provide information about our fiduciary experience.
Our Partners and their team get to work on your case, keeping you informed every step of the way.
We will hard on the case to recover funds and substantial returns to the defrauded investor or creditors.
What is a Receivership?
A receivership is a legal process in which a court appoints a neutral third-party known as a receiver to take over and manage the assets, business affairs, or property of a company, individual or entity. This is usually done in situations where the entity is in financial distress or is facing legal challenges.
The receiver’s role is to take control of the entity’s assets, preserve them, and manage them in a way that maximizes their value for the benefit of creditors, stakeholders, and other parties involved. The receiver is typically appointed to act as a custodian of the assets, and has the power to make decisions regarding the management, operation, and sale of assets, subject to court approval.
Our lawyers at Damian | Valori | Culmo have extensive experience in receivership matters and can assist clients who are facing financial distress or legal challenges, such as bankruptcy proceedings, securities fraud cases, and other types of legal disputes.
Why Choose Us
Our attorneys have extensive experience in receivership matters, including serving as court-appointed receivers and representing clients in receivership proceedings. We have a proven track record of success in managing and preserving assets, maximizing their value, and protecting the interests of all parties involved.
Our team consists of experienced litigators, former prosecutors, and asset managers who have a deep understanding of the legal, financial, and operational issues that arise in receivership matters. We stay up-to-date with the latest developments in receivership law and practice, and use this knowledge to provide strategic advice and guidance to our clients.
We understand that receivership matters can be complex and time-consuming, and we work efficiently to achieve the best possible outcome for our clients. We are committed to providing responsive and effective representation, and we work closely with our clients to develop a customized strategy that meets their needs.
Our firm has a strong reputation in the legal community for providing high-quality, effective representation in receivership matters. We have made favorable law in the U.S. Eleventh Circuit that governs receivership practice in the Southeast, which has been positively referenced by courts across the country.
We prioritize our clients’ needs and work tirelessly to protect their interests. We provide personalized attention and tailor our approach to each client’s unique circumstances, ensuring that they receive the best possible representation and outcome.
Our firm has a proven track record of achieving strong results for our clients in receivership matters. We have successfully managed complex receiverships involving multiple stakeholders and assets, and have helped clients recover significant amounts of money and assets. We are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for our clients and work tirelessly to achieve their goals.
At Damian | Valori | Culmo, our team of dedicated and experienced attorneys are committed to providing high-quality legal representation to businesses and individuals.
Ready to Serve
Our dedicated team of experienced professionals are ready to serve as the Court’s agent. Contact us today so we may begin providing exceptional service, maximizing recovery, and creating a strong legal partnership.
